Redefining power structures: Teacher leadership and distributed management in education

Authors

  • Smaranika Samal Author
  • Dr. Dipanshu Sharma Author
  • Ishita Mishra STUDENT Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66483/eip.2026.1.1.003

Keywords:

TEACHER LEADERSHIP, DISTRIBUTED LEADERSHIP, DISTRIBUTED MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES,, RELATIONAL POWER, ORGANISATIONAL ADAPTABILITY, HIERARCHICAL FLATTENING

Abstract

The hierarchical nature of different institutional arrangements, especially those that are entrenched in the Indian context, has, historically and to some extent, suppressed the agency of teachers, hampered innovation, and reduced their responsiveness to the changing needs of modern education. The centralisation of authorities, which is based on these top-down structures with roots in colonial bureaucratic legacies, limits the power to make professional decisions and empower teachers. It presents a perspective on the future of teacher leadership, as conceptualised by the authors as an informal, expertise-based influence that is not confined to the classroom setting, but redefines leadership as a distributed, place-based praxis. This reconceptualization aims at reducing rigorous hierarchies through the prism of distributed management principles.  Based on the development of distributed leadership as an emergent phenomenon by Spillane and others, which is built upon the interactions between actors, contexts, and artefacts, the paper will incorporate teacher-leadership conceptions that forecast empowerment, the development of professional communities, and influence within the school system. Theoretical underpinnings based on organisational learning, social constructivism, analysis of managerialism, and ideas of relational power support the suggestion that the hierarchies can be redesigned into horizontal, networked interdependencies.  The Consistent model proposed is the Distributed Teacher Leadership Model (DTLM) that aligns the mobilisation of instructional leaders into distributed systems and the decentralisation of hierarchical structures and processes of interdependence and redistribution of authority and development of adaptability, agency, and collective efficacy. In addition, the DTLM aligns with the focus on teacher empowerment and decentralised governance outlined in the National Education Policy (NEP 2020), which provides conceptual connections between bureaucratic structures in their inner core based on equitable and democratic processes. The model achieves international pertinence with its appeal to the larger paradigm shift that is post-heroic, relational leadership in the complex educational contexts. The authors observe that distributed teacher leadership is potentially transformative to the development of responsive and inclusive organisations, but conclude by accepting that additional theoretical development, especially relating to critical social-justice and post-colonial aspects, is still achievable.

Author Biographies

  • Smaranika Samal

    Smaranika Samal is an aspiring scholar currently pursuing an integrated B.A.B.Ed. at the Regional Institute of Education (RIE), Bhubneswar. A merit scholar and top-ranking alumna of Kendriya Vidyalaya No. 1, Bhubneswar, her academic foundation is marked by consistent excellence in the humanities and professional education.

    Her research interests are multidisciplinary, focusing on Geography, innovations in pedagogical knowledge, and the aspects of Ancient and Modern Indian History. She is particularly interested in studying political behavior and civic engagement, interests furthered by her success in the Zonal Level Youth Parliament Competition, which led to an official visit to the New Parliament of India.

    In addition to her academic pursuits, Smaranika is a recognized orator, having secured first prize in the MAN Trust debate competition and selection for the VBYLD National Competition 2025-26. Her professional background includes a Content Writing Internship via Internshala, through which she has refined her ability to synthesize complex information for diverse audiences.

  • Dr. Dipanshu Sharma

    Dr. Dipanshu Sharma is an Assistant Professor in Social Science Education at the Regional Institute of Education (RIE), NCERT, Bhubaneswar, a premier institution dedicated to teacher education and academic capacity-building in eastern India. His academic focus encompasses History, Philosophy, Indian Knowledge Systems, and ICT in Education. Dr. Sharma holds a diverse academic portfolio, including an M.A. in History, M.A. in Philosophy, M.Ed., and a Ph.D. in Education, along with a Certificate Course in French. He has extensive teaching experience across multiple levels, having taught at the school level for 2 years, undergraduate level for 6 years, and postgraduate level (M.A., M.Ed.) for 4 years. His primary research interests include Social Science pedagogy, the integration of ICT in teaching-learning, and the philosophical underpinnings of education, especially within the context of Indian knowledge traditions.

    Dr. Sharma’s publication record reflects a consistent engagement with themes such as digital learning, student study behaviors, instructional strategies, and the impact of technology in education. His notable works include “E-learning as a Catalyst for Authentic and Meaningful Learning Experiences” (2021), “Comparison of Study Habits of Adolescents Using Internet for Academic and Non-Academic Purposes” (2020), and “Effect of Computer-Mediated Instruction on Achievement in Biology in Relation to Intelligence” (2019), among several other studies conducted between 2012 and 2017.He has qualified the UGC-NET with Junior Research Fellowship (JRF) in Education (2011) and in History (2019). In addition to his academic roles, Dr. Sharma has served as the NSS Programme Officer at the Government College of Education, Chandigarh, and is currently the School Coordinator for the Vidyanjali Portal, under the Ministry of Education, Government of India.Dr. Sharma is actively involved in training, extension, and collaborative academic programs. He recently served as an observer for CEE 2024 at the Delhi nodal center, contributed to NCERT's Manodarpan Sahyog Programme, and was an expert contributor to a national-level workshop on Teacher’s Guidebooks for tribal and minority languages at NCERT, New Delhi. He also coordinated inter-institutional visits involving M.Ed. students and faculty from Visva-Bharati University and NDWCTE, Bhubaneswar, and delivered an NCERT live session on fostering healthy parent–teen dynamics.

    For academic correspondence, Dr. Sharma can be reached at drdipanshusharma@gmail.com. His office is located at the Regional Institute of Education, Sachivalaya Marg, Bhubaneswar – 751022, Odisha.

References

1. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Addison-Wesley.

2. Ball, S. J. (2013). Foucault, power, and education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203078662

3. Bhola, S., & Dhanawade, S. (2024). Antecedents and consequences of distributed leadership in Indian higher education. International Journal of Educational Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2023-0116

4. Cheng, A. Y., & Szeto, E. (2016). Teacher leadership development and principal facilitation: Novice teachers’ perspectives. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.003

5. Cheung, R., Reinhardt, T., Stone, E., & Little, J. W. (2018). Defining teacher leadership: A framework. Phi Delta Kappan, 100(3), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721718809069

6. Crawford, M. (2012). Solo and distributed leadership: Definitions and dilemmas. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 40(5), 610–620. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143212451175

7. Conan Simpson, J. (2021). Fostering teacher leadership in K-12 schools: A review of the literature. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 34(2), 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21374

8. Deem, R. (2003). Death to critique and dissent? The policies and practices of new managerialism and of ‘evidence-based practice’. Gender and Education, 15(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954025032000042167

9. Eckert, J., & Daughtrey, A. (2019). Teacher leadership development: Tracking one district’s progress over three years. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 27, Article 42. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.27.4130

10. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. Pantheon Books.

11. Frontiers in Education. (2025). Understanding teacher agency in implementing inclusive education policy. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1678998

12. Government of India. (2020). National Education Policy 2020. Ministry of Education. https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/NEP_Final_English_0.pdf

13. Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 423–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00120-0

14. Gronn, P. (2009). Leadership configurations. Leadership, 5(3), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715009337770

15. Hallinger, P. (2005). Instructional leadership and the school principal: A passing fancy that refuses to fade away. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760500244793

16. Harris, A. (2008). Distributed leadership: According to the evidence. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 172–188. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230810863253

17. Harris, A. (2014). Distributed leadership matters: Perspectives, practicalities, and potential. Corwin Press. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483332574

18. Indian Express. (2020, August 14). A system of hierarchy. https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/nep-education-system-caste-hierarchy-inequality-6789387

19. Khalifa, M. A., Khalil, D., Marsh, T. E. J., & Halloran, C. (2019). Toward an Indigenous, decolonizing school leadership: A literature review. Educational Administration Quarterly, 55(4), 571–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18809348

20. Kumar, S., & Choudhury, P. (2024). Skills and role of teacher according to NEP 2020. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14723440

21. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2005). A review of transformational school leadership research 1996–2005. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 177–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760500244769

22. Limin Zhang, Tingting Wu, Lijia Liu, Ping Ren, & Chaopai Lin. (2022). The relationship between Chinese preschool principal leadership styles and teacher leadership: Exploring the mediating effect of psychological capital. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1006184. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1006184

23. Muijs, D., & Harris, A. (2006). Teacher led school improvement: Teacher leadership in the UK. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(8), 961–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.010

24. Mifsud, D. (2021). Distributed leadership: A critical analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 59(3), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-06-2020-0239

25. Nicholas Sun-keung Pang, & Zhuang Miao. (2017). The roles of teacher leadership in Shanghai education success. In BCES Conference Books (Vol. 15, pp. 93–100). https://doaj.org/article/d61f2882821c4f91ab7149e6bbfefea2

26. Rolf Blank. (2021). New research on teacher leadership in schools: Efficacy of a survey method for analyzing multiple dimensions of leadership. Journal of Interdisciplinary Teacher Leadership. https://doi.org/10.46767/kfp.2016-0036

27. Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday/Currency.

28. Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. Jossey-Bass.

29. Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027032000106726

30. Tarek Shal, Norma Ghamrawi, Abdullah Abu-Tineh, Yousef M. Al-Shaboul, & Abdellatif Sellami. (2024). Teacher leadership and virtual communities: Unpacking teacher agency and distributed leadership. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12446-5

31. Theoharis, G. (2007). Social justice educational leaders and resistance: Toward a theory of social justice leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(2), 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X06293717

32. Tian, M., Risku, M., & Collin, K. (2016). A meta-analysis of distributed leadership from 2002 to 2013: Theory development, empirical evidence and future research focus. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(1), 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214558576

33. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4

34. Wenner, J. A., & Campbell, T. (2017). The theoretical and empirical basis of teacher leadership: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 134–171. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316653478

35. Wikipedia. (2025). Distributed leadership. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_leadership

36. Wikipedia. (2025). Education in India. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_in_India

37. Williams, C. G. (2011). Distributed leadership in South African schools: Possibilities and constraints. South African Journal of Education, 31(2), 190–200.

38. York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 255–316. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074003255

Downloads

Published

2026-06-15 — Updated on 2026-08-11

Versions

Data Availability Statement

THERE WAS NO DATA USED HERE. IT WAS A CONCEPTUAL PAPER.

How to Cite

Redefining power structures: Teacher leadership and distributed management in education. (2026). Educational Inquiry and Practice, 1(1), 26-45. https://doi.org/10.66483/eip.2026.1.1.003 (Original work published 2026)

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.